Friday, 7 February 2014

Runner Runner review: Does the house always win?

Hello! Here is my review of Runner Runner.

Directed by Brad Furman the film focuses on gambling student Richie Furst, Justin Timberlake, who loses all his tuition money to a scam in a gambling website run by Ivan Block (tee hee) played by Not Christian Bale, I mean Ben Affleck. Richie promptly travels to Block’s base of operations in Costa Rica to confront him and get his money back but instead he gets sucked into Block’s world.

First things first, this film isn’t offensively bad. Well, it is offensive. The majority of the women in it are purely there as sex objects from Gemma Arterton as Block’s secretary, business partner/ girlfriend and J.T’s love interest, who doesn’t really do anything except look pretty. No wait she helps a bit…by looking pretty, though to be honest who can blame her for getting all swoony between Ben Affleck and J.T. Also there are plenty of ‘supporting’ roles that could have been played by women and nothing would have had to change it just wouldn’t have been so sexist and maybe a little more interesting.

So, whilst offensively bad in terms of ignorant sexism, it isn’t an offensively bad movie. You aren’t going to socially disown whoever suggested it, instead you’ll probably just say ‘meh’ and turn it off. It never falls into the depths of truly bad, but it’s never really that good either. It’s occasionally pretty and the music is good but ultimately when your friends asked you what you watched at the weekend, you’ll reply with ‘something with Ben Affleck and crocodiles and I think there was something about gambling. ‘

So yes the gambling, pretty big part of the movie right. Right? Not really. The opening credits play over a series of news reports seemingly chastising online gambling; specifically the ease to play and to lose mass amounts of money, and addiction among college students. We then cut to J.T talking to someone about selling gambling and not being able to pay his tuition, next we see him try to win his tuition and failing. After that it falls into the background and reappears as numbers. Lots of numbers.

So, does this mean the movie is an insightful look at online gambling? Does it throw a noble hero into a morally ambiguous world and whilst exploring, offer no concrete answers, providing a modern great in the vein of Casino or The Hustler?

No.

The plot can be summed up thusly: J.T goes to Block with ‘noble’ intentions, gets sucked in to the excess, things go well and then everything goes wrong. Yeah? What else did you think would happen?

A solid, if not great performance from J.T, I found Richie to be an annoying and entitled so and so. At one stage he is traumatised by not being able to work in Wall Street and not be really rich. In fact that seems to be his motive throughout the movie. He wants to do an MA so he can get another job on Wall Street and make money. Yet he doesn’t really feel that he should have to pay for his education (he made too much money before he lost it the first time in wall street) hence the gambling for tuition fees. It’s very hard to sympathise with him when all the bad stuff could have been avoided if he had just GOTTEN A JOB. Cry me a river Justin (that’s funny because he did a song called that.)
Right rants over; those are the points that annoyed me the most and the rest of the review will be much more neutral.

The film looks great, the cast is collectively handsome and some of the locales are pretty and occasionally interesting. The film is set in Costa Rica (but filmed in Puerto Rico) but you can never really tell. Most of the film takes place in the Americanised areas such as penthouses and mariners (all pointed toward a deep excess that the film often mentions but never really goes for) that could be anywhere in the world with sun and rich people. The scenes that are supposed to be the more grass root areas look good and carry some interesting features, but the reliance on the chic lifestyle often make these locale switches quite jarring. Whilst the setting of Costa Rica worked on a true to life political level, it didn’t really work in any other way. Costa Rica is a beautiful place with an emphasis on eco-tourism so has many stunning places of natural beauty that could have been used to help raise the status of the film but these are never even hinted at. The characters are all quite one dimensional and inconsistent so no eyebrows would be raised if one of them suddenly decided to take a hike. So in the end the setting becomes a convenience that could have been used much better.
Finally, I shall talk about the main pull of the movie, Ben Affleck. As his first film post Batfleck (and following from the amazing Argo and unseen but quietly beautiful To The Wonder) there was going to be a lot hanging on this movie and it is testament to its forgetableness that it didn’t ignite more hate/love/ambivalence/angry confusion towards the future Batman. That said, he is by far the best thing in the film. All the characters are dicks (literally and metaphorically) and the world is just as bad and Block seems to be the only character aware of this and thusly has fun and takes full advantage. So in a weird way you cheer for him more than the actual hero who does many similar things to Block but just with some half arsed nobility behind him.
Affleck’s performance, Much like his character, has ‘a may as well’ vibe to it and whilst it is still the best thing in the film, it begs the question; why is Ben Affleck in this? And why is Leonardo DiCaprio a producer? What incrimination photos exist and how can I see them?

I’m getting side-tracked but you see my point. And it has to be said, despite being the best part in the film, it’s a good job most people didn’t see it/can’t remember it because it really is Affleck’s worst film in a long time. Badfleck, if you will. A return to the sort of form that makes all his current, well deserved, success and reputation a surprise.

To conclude, this is an alright film. You won’t hate it, at most you’ll be annoyed by it but if you are it doesn’t matter because you won’t remember it by Monday. The best way to think of it is as something to remind us just how good Argo and The Town are.

Oh yeah, also there could be a good point in there about modern western societies devil may care attitude to money, entertainment and self-advancement but it never amounts to anything. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DksSPZTZES0    (see told you it was real)



No comments:

Post a Comment